DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

An un-stabilized brick?

Started Apr 14, 2022 | Discussions thread
Robmas4229
OP Robmas4229 Senior Member • Posts: 1,272
Re: An un-stabilized brick?
2

Thanks to everyone who provided input.

As I had hoped, it seems that not having OIS isn't a deal-breaker for this lens. Having the f/2.8 constant aperture and the mass of the lens appear to be benefits. After all, we didn't always have stabilization in bodies or lenses, and photography survived.

I tried to love the 16-80 but after a year, it didn't work out for me. I didn't mention that in my OP because I didn't want the conversation to go down THAT road. It wasn't because of the size as I have the 18-55 and some primes for when I want to keep things compact.

Now I must determine if I can really justify the 16-55, or if my 18-55 is good enough for my needs. I'm not a pro and don't shoot events or weddings, mostly just landscapes, seascapes, scenery and general walk around in nature or occasional urbania.

Thanks again.

-Rob

 Robmas4229's gear list:Robmas4229's gear list
Fujifilm X-E3 Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-T30 II Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS Samyang 12mm F2.0 NCS CS +7 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow