Sagittarius
Veteran Member
What do you think about this one?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, I was not clear. I meant this monitor and take money out of equation. BTW I have ASUS ProArt PA279Q 2560 x 1440 wide gamut for quite a few years and it goes strong. I calibrate it with SpydeXElite and check calibration every month. No drift at all. Interesting that ASUS claims that PA27UCX has delta E<1.Then perhaps a truly professional monitor from one of Nick's links.What if we will take money out of equation?I question the value of mini-LED in general, given its high prices so far.
As I understand it each zone consists of thousands of pixels all controlled together, not separately. Worth it? Not to me, but that's not my decision, that's the OP's.
Asus makes all sort of claims and not all of them are always true - at least some of them are just be misleading. I've learned that Asus pushes quite aggressive marketing claiming 'industry leading' performance, professionalism and such. But in fact Asus monitors are very much consumer versions of professional products and they tend appeal to crowd that someone might categorize as 'computer nerds'. Professionals are not 'better', 'discerning' or anything, but when it comes to real professional environments, the Asus just doesn't cut it. That's why it's manufacturers like Eizo who bring their tools to movie productions and such. They can guarantee quality control and same performance over tens or hundreds of monitors. Can one be fully satisfied with Asus? Absolutely and without any hesitations (tools doesn't make one a better or worse human)! It just itches me to see Asus marketing claims... So, no wrong going Asus 4K monitor if you want to. For quality reviews see, for example, prad.de (if you are using Chrome you can translate the reviews easily on the fly)Sorry, I was not clear. I meant this monitor and take money out of equation. BTW I have ASUS ProArt PA279Q 2560 x 1440 wide gamut for quite a few years and it goes strong. I calibrate it with SpydeXElite and check calibration every month. No drift at all. Interesting that ASUS claims that PA27UCX has delta E<1.Then perhaps a truly professional monitor from one of Nick's links.What if we will take money out of equation?I question the value of mini-LED in general, given its high prices so far.
As I understand it each zone consists of thousands of pixels all controlled together, not separately. Worth it? Not to me, but that's not my decision, that's the OP's.
I've looked at Eizo wide gamut monitors, but they are not available anywhere.Asus makes all sort of claims and not all of them are always true - at least some of them are just be misleading. I've learned that Asus pushes quite aggressive marketing claiming 'industry leading' performance, professionalism and such. But in fact Asus monitors are very much consumer versions of professional products and they tend appeal to crowd that someone might categorize as 'computer nerds'. Professionals are not 'better', 'discerning' or anything, but when it comes to real professional environments, the Asus just doesn't cut it. That's why it's manufacturers like Eizo who bring their tools to movie productions and such. They can guarantee quality control and same performance over tens or hundreds of monitors. Can one be fully satisfied with Asus? Absolutely and without any hesitations (tools doesn't make one a better or worse human)! It just itches me to see Asus marketing claims... So, no wrong going Asus 4K monitor if you want to. For quality reviews see, for example, prad.de (if you are using Chrome you can translate the reviews easily on the fly)Sorry, I was not clear. I meant this monitor and take money out of equation. BTW I have ASUS ProArt PA279Q 2560 x 1440 wide gamut for quite a few years and it goes strong. I calibrate it with SpydeXElite and check calibration every month. No drift at all. Interesting that ASUS claims that PA27UCX has delta E<1.Then perhaps a truly professional monitor from one of Nick's links.What if we will take money out of equation?I question the value of mini-LED in general, given its high prices so far.
As I understand it each zone consists of thousands of pixels all controlled together, not separately. Worth it? Not to me, but that's not my decision, that's the OP's.
One other thing to consider; do you really want different areas (zones) of the monitor to have a brightness that varies depending on each area's content?Sorry, I was not clear. I meant this monitor and take money out of equation.Then perhaps a truly professional monitor from one of Nick's links.What if we will take money out of equation?I question the value of mini-LED in general, given its high prices so far.
As I understand it each zone consists of thousands of pixels all controlled together, not separately. Worth it? Not to me, but that's not my decision, that's the OP's.
I have no problem whatever with Asus products; I've had a number of their motherboards and computers; if I saw a monitor of theirs I found particularly desirable, I'd buy it. Some are very nice.BTW I have ASUS ProArt PA279Q 2560 x 1440 wide gamut for quite a few years and it goes strong.
My $500 32" 4K monitor has a measured maximum deltaE of 1.67, average of 0.08 according to DisplayCAL. I can live with that.I calibrate it with SpydeXElite and check calibration every month. No drift at all. Interesting that ASUS claims that PA27UCX has delta E<1.
You can disable dynamic dimming. You can also enable or disable HDR.One other thing to consider; do you really want different areas (zones) of the monitor to have a brightness that varies depending on each area's content?Sorry, I was not clear. I meant this monitor and take money out of equation.Then perhaps a truly professional monitor from one of Nick's links.What if we will take money out of equation?I question the value of mini-LED in general, given its high prices so far.
As I understand it each zone consists of thousands of pixels all controlled together, not separately. Worth it? Not to me, but that's not my decision, that's the OP's.
--Seems to me mini-LED would be fine for video, where things are constantly changing anyway, but do we want that variation on a still image?
(Anyone; if I have a mistaken concept of mini-LED's function, please correct me.)
I have no problem whatever with Asus products; I've had a number of their motherboards and computers; if I saw a monitor of theirs I found particularly desirable, I'd buy it. Some are very nice.BTW I have ASUS ProArt PA279Q 2560 x 1440 wide gamut for quite a few years and it goes strong.
My $500 32" 4K monitor has a measured maximum deltaE of 1.67, average of 0.08 according to DisplayCAL. I can live with that.I calibrate it with SpydeXElite and check calibration every month. No drift at all. Interesting that ASUS claims that PA27UCX has delta E<1.
I better not mention my 24" Samsung monitor, then. It harks from 2008......The monitor is still available new, but it's an old design. (2019. Ancient in PC terms, apparently.)
www.asus.com
I had a Samsung amber monochrome composite video monitor in the middle 1980's at work.I better not mention my 24" Samsung monitor, then. It harks from 2008......The monitor is still available new, but it's an old design. (2019. Ancient in PC terms, apparently.)
Had a lot of hairy experiences with it? ;-)I had a Samsung amber monochrome composite video monitor in the middle 1980's at work.I better not mention my 24" Samsung monitor, then. It harks from 2008......The monitor is still available new, but it's an old design. (2019. Ancient in PC terms, apparently.)
Naturally, I had to label the computer it went with "Delilah".
:-D And took a haircut when I sold it.Had a lot of hairy experiences with it? ;-)I had a Samsung amber monochrome composite video monitor in the middle 1980's at work.I better not mention my 24" Samsung monitor, then. It harks from 2008......The monitor is still available new, but it's an old design. (2019. Ancient in PC terms, apparently.)
Naturally, I had to label the computer it went with "Delilah".
Very interesting, thanks for mentioning it.Or maybe, since a mini-LED monitor is what you want, spend a little more for a larger monitor with many more zones and a higher static contrast ratio, though giving up a bit of Adobe RGB coverage:Speaking as someone who doesn't play at that level, it seems rather dear for a 27" 60Hz display. I see that it's specified at a peak brightness of 1000 nits, which may be what you're paying for.
I might consider a cheapo like an Eizo, if your primary purpose is photo editing. ;-)
https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/sho...21q/apd/210-ayci/monitors-monitor-accessories
I suspect that the LG's "typical" power consumption is at default brightness level, i.e., near eyeball-scorching in my dim computer room, and the Dell's "operational" would depend on what image is displayed.Very interesting, thanks for mentioning it.Or maybe, since a mini-LED monitor is what you want, spend a little more for a larger monitor with many more zones and a higher static contrast ratio, though giving up a bit of Adobe RGB coverage:Speaking as someone who doesn't play at that level, it seems rather dear for a 27" 60Hz display. I see that it's specified at a peak brightness of 1000 nits, which may be what you're paying for.
I might consider a cheapo like an Eizo, if your primary purpose is photo editing. ;-)
https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/sho...21q/apd/210-ayci/monitors-monitor-accessories
I note that on the B&H website, where unlike Dell they specify Watts power consumption,
They are not entirely comparable because the UP3221Q has 100% DCI-P3 and self calibration.
- Dell UP3221Q - 13 W (Typical) 0.5 W (Standby) - $3900
- LG 32YK500 - 50 W (Typical) 0.5 W (Standby) - $297
However I'm impressed by low power consumption of mini LED. As you might've expected.
Can't argue with the specs and if the price isn't a problem get it. After paying thousands for camera equipment why cheap out on the monitor which may be the most important part of a workflow.What do you think about this one?
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1570527-REG/asus_pa27ucx_k_27_mini_led_4k.html/specs
...and monitors generally have a longer life than cameras, which tend to get replaced as soon as the next shiny one comes along...After paying thousands for camera equipment why cheap out on the monitor which may be the most important part of a workflow.
Just to be clear, are you referring to the PA27UCX-K?So I bit a bullet and got this monitor. Right of the box, using Adobe RGB preset it displayed gorgeous colors in LR classic. I reduced brightness to 25% which will give me approx. 120 cd/m2. It comes with X-rite i1Display Pro and ASUS's own calibration software. All calibration data stays in monitor's internal LUT. Tonight I will try to calibrate it and see where it will take me.
Yes, it is PA27UCX-K. When you save in the internal LUT, monitor becomes independent from the computer and will keep settings if connected to another computer. Does your monitor have a driver? Mine does not and shows up in the devise manager as a generick monitor.Just to be clear, are you referring to the PA27UCX-K?So I bit a bullet and got this monitor. Right of the box, using Adobe RGB preset it displayed gorgeous colors in LR classic. I reduced brightness to 25% which will give me approx. 120 cd/m2. It comes with X-rite i1Display Pro and ASUS's own calibration software. All calibration data stays in monitor's internal LUT. Tonight I will try to calibrate it and see where it will take me.
If it's like my PA329c, you have two choices for calibration: you can save two custom LUTs, or you can run a calibration using the presets and create a custom icm file, just like with an inexpensive monitor.
I don't know which approach is superior. Seems like the LUT one should be, but...
Yes, I know. The monitor has only been used on one PC so far, so that aspect (having the LUT stored in the monitor, and moving with it) isn't of great value to me.Yes, it is PA27UCX-K. When you save in the internal LUT, monitor becomes independent from the computer and will keep settings if connected to another computer. Does your monitor have a driver? Mine does not and shows up in the devise manager as a generick monitor.
Unfortunately this link downloads only ProArt Calibration software and no driver.(snip)
My monitor has a "driver". There's one available for yours: https://www.asus.com/us/Displays-De...Download/?model2Name=ProArt-Display-PA27UCX-K
(It's the same driver for all recent versions of Windows. Not listed for Windows 11, but should be OK for that, too.)