Manual Focus and X-Pro

bs1946 wrote:

Zinch wrote:

bs1946 wrote:

Using manual lenses on the X-Pro with the OVF is pathetic. If you have used a Leica M or any other real rangefinder camera, you will be in for a major disappointment. I have an X-Pro2 and an X-T2 and when I use the X-Pro2 with a manual lens, I always use the EVF, usually with peaking. Almost never use the OVF and only with AF lenses. The dual OVF/EVF on the X100 series and the X-Pro series was one of those great ideas that Fuji's designers completely screwed up. Besides owning an X-Pro1 and two X-Pro2s, I have owned every X100 model from the original through the X100F and almost never used the OVF on any of them.

I think this is an unfair assessment. Until the release of the Voigtlander lenses there wasn't any manual focus lens designed to be used with the X-Pro or X100 line.

Why, the OVF on the X-Pro line offers nothing to assist manual focus beyond using your eyeball. The new Voigtlander 33mm f1.2 is no different, the electronics on the lens do nothing to make the OVF magically work any better. The best Fuji came up with was that stupid little ERF down in the corner of the OVF that is basically a miniature EVF.

Is like saying that the Leica rangefinders are unusable because you have only used lenses without mechanical conection with the camera (the M lenses have to comunicate the focus distance mechanicaly with the camera for it to work).

Just like with Fuji, you can get adapters that allow the use of vintage non-m-mount lenses on a Leica M.

And if I'm nos mistaken, if they are not rangefinder lenses you can't focus properly with the Leica

AFAIK, people that have used the Voigtlander lens with the X-Pro3 (sadly it doesn't work in older cameras) is happy with it.

The lens works just like any other manual lens on older bodies, you just loose the electronics.

-- hide signature --

Bill S.
www.flickr.com/photos/wrs1946
“Sharpness is a bourgeois concept”
- Henri Cartier-Bresson -