(unknown member)
•
Senior Member
•
Posts: 1,684
Re: Reverse-Lens Macro
Macro guy wrote:
I prefer mounting the reversed lens on a bellows. I find that type of a setup gives me the greatest flexibility. I can change my magnification with a given lens (within that lens' focal length parameters) and I can focus without changing my magnification.
Here's what my setup looks like. It's not the greatest pic, I took it with my phone, but you get the gist.
Our setups are similar, except mine is more for the field than the studio. It'd be pretty difficult to hand-hold that set-up. I think a bellows is really only necessary for super-high magnification, again in the studio, which is all but impossible to get on live subjects, especially in the field.
I do much more field work than studio shots, and I only shoot live subjects, preferably in their natural environment. My studio set up is pretty complicated, if I find uncooperative subjects in nature that require studio placement. But it's such a hassle, that I never bother with it much anymore.
Here's my field setup, for live subjects, using reverse-macro:
Zoom Nikkor AI-S 28-85mm f/3.5-4.5 AI-S reverse-mounted on D500
The diffused flash is not shown.
The reversed-zoom lens is capable of going from .25 to 2.9x. Even when I used to shoot the MPE 65, I rarely went over 3x, so shooting @ 4-5x is of no real interest to me.
If I have an immobile subject, like a crab spider, I'll use the tripod + macro rails to develop stacks, but not the flash. I prefer natural light, wherever possible.
However, if I have a moving subject, like a jumping spider or other, then I just unsnap the camera from the tripod and deploy the camera + flash handheld, stopping down for DOF, rather than stacking.
These days, I've replaced reverse-lens macro with Laowa macro optics. Still, I enjoy reverse-macro photography for fun sometimes, but the Laowa glass is pretty good.
-- hide signature --
Please forgive: I use voice text, so there may be typos. Hopefully it still makes sense
~
♦ Blog
♦ Facebook
♦ Flickr