Anyone love the 40-150 F4?

Started 11 months ago | Discussions thread
ossid New Member • Posts: 24
Re: Anyone love the 40-150 F4?
4

Henry Stamm wrote:

plantdoc wrote:

Might consider it. Love the 12-45. I wish it went to 200mm and would be an option to the very expensive Panasonic 50-200. Also my copy of the Panasonic 45-150 is quite good so it is a hard decision for limited budget.

Greg

Very expensive is relative to one's budget, yes? I would no more buy the 40-150 f4 for $900 when the PL 50-200 f2.8-4 is available for the inexpensive price, to me, of about $1400 (in my case, I bought for under $1300). Faster throughout much the same range, excellent quality build, light weight (light enough for me), and longer FL to boot. I'm sure the PRO 40-150 f4 has advantages prized by some, but for me, the PL makes a lot more sense for my style of photography. It's all about one's desires & budget, correct?

I think you are kind of comparing apples to or... pears at least. PL 50-200 is a great lens apparently, but it is class of it's own in size and weight.
OM Pro 40-150 f/4 is 382g where PL is 655g and significantly larger too.
I'm expecting this new OM pro being very sharp at f/4 which is probably true when I look at the dpreview OM-1 sample gallery(significant amount of them are shot with a OM pro 40-150 I think)

 ossid's gear list:ossid's gear list
Olympus E-M1 II Panasonic 20mm F1.7 II Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Pro OM System 40-150mm F4.0 PRO
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
MNE
(unknown member)
MNE
MNE
MNE
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow