Reversing 50mm?
gardenersassistant wrote:
3D Gunner wrote:
gardenersassistant wrote:
How does that work in practical terms? For example, suppose I want to reverse mount an FD lens on to an MFT body. If I put an FD to MFT adapter on the body it presents an FD mount to attach to. Do I then put an FD reverse adapter on to the FD to MFT adapter, and then attach the lens to the reverse adapter?
So, the solution is "reverse to adapter" (and it works very well).
What are the benefits of reversing to adapter rather than reversing to body? Sharper images? Less aberrations? More magnification? A greater range of magnification? With my two experiments the shorter focal length produced the greatest magnification, but changing the focus between infinity and nearest focus didn't change the magnification for one of them, and only changed it a small amount for the other one. Is that normal with lenses that are reversed to body? Do you get a better range of magnifications when reversing to adapter? (Unfortunately I only have the reversers needed for reverse to body and don't have the reversers needed to experiment with reverse to adapter, hence my questions.)
Lenses are made so they can focus as long as they are at the proper distance away from your camera's image sensor.
What is puzzling me here is the "as long as", which presumably means the lens can't focus if it isn't at the proper distance from the sensor. However, if your options 1 and 2 put the lens at the right distance from the sensor so it can focus, how is it that the reverse to body option I used also allows the lens to focus, with it being at the wrong distance from the sensor? I used
3. m4/3 body + reverse ring + reverted lens
which puts the reverted lens closer to the sensor than your options 1 and 2.
So, an m4/3 to Pentax adapter will give you functionality of Pentax lenses on both directions, normal or inverted.
"Inverted to body" may give you a too short distance to sensor, depending on physical lens construction.
But you can use an adapter for "Inverted to body" option plus some extenders.
1. - m4/3 body + Lens adapter + reverse ring + reverted lens
2. - m4/3 body + reverse ring for desired diameter + extension rings with same diameter + reverted lens. Extension rings have the same effect as some short macro tubes.
By example, You can use a Macro Reverse Mount Adapter m4/3 to 52mm, and 52mm to any other diameter adapters plus extension rings, to use a lot of inverted lenses made any brand.
I think the simple logic is to reproduce the register distance of the original body for the lens.
I want the same effect as reversing the lens on a K-mount body, so I need to the m4/3 to PK adapter. When I reverse mount the 50mm, I expect 1:1.
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 12, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 17, 2022
|
1 |
|
|
(unknown member)
|
Feb 18, 2022
|
2 |
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2022
|
1 |
|
|
(unknown member)
|
Feb 18, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2022
|
|
|
|
(unknown member)
|
Feb 18, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2022
|
1 |
|
|
(unknown member)
|
Feb 19, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 19, 2022
|
1 |
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20, 2022
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Holy Stone produces dozens of low-cost drone models aimed at consumers. We look at the HS710 and HS175D to see if they stack up to other sub-250g offerings. Are these secretly great or more like toys?
It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good?
After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts.
The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. We think it rises to the challenge.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.