do you think of getting 100-400 (with TC) vs 200-600 for wildlife , or else?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Tony Lau Regular Member • Posts: 465
do you think of getting 100-400 (with TC) vs 200-600 for wildlife , or else?

it may be too early to see, but since 200-600 in the road map and probably avail soon, it is good to discuss which path to go for casual wildlife lens.

the path 100-400 +TC will probably cost you 3000$+, while i must guess the 200-600 will be less than 1500$.

what do you think, and if 100-400 +TC option, cost wise it is on par with 500 f5.6 pf F mount (i must guess many of us already have FTZ), which is so nice for wildlife.

It is hard too choose, correct, your onion?

-- hide signature --

Tony
Z6+14-30 f4 S +24-70 f4 S+ 85 f1.8 S+ 70-300 AF-P F4.5-5.6E+SB700+SB-400+ RX100 IV+Gitzo GT2531

 Tony Lau's gear list:Tony Lau's gear list
Sony RX100 IV Nikon Z7 Nikon Z6 Nikon AP-F 70-300mm F4.5-5.6E Nikon Z 24-70mm F4 +9 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow