M6 II "hidden features" thread

wddxnyr wrote:

My whole point is: EFCS is useful and should be included;

if technically possible - yes it should

it hasn't been established that it is technically possible without bugs

shutter shock is a problem under some cases.

"some" is a "very small" measure for me considering the workarounds and availability of e-shutter

While a few people here tried to tell me that:

1. No EFCS is fine (for all kind of reasons)

there are compromises to all cameras

if it is technically possible, which hasn't been established, and you haven't proven yet, then it isn't fine

2. Shutter shock is not an issue at all (xx didn't see it)

I've seen it on small IS lenses - not primes or more expensive IS systems

- it has to do with the vibration with these cheap IS systems (imagine held up by springs and rubber bands

3. XX camera also has XX problems

it is the system - cheap IS lenses + a bit harsher mechanical shutter

In their world pointing out a few drawbacks of their camera is too much for them.

to be fair -

every camera has its drawbacks

I'd like it to have EFCS if technically possible - which hasn't been established

I love the e-shutter workaround so much, I wouldn't buy the m50 II that has efcs

My RP has only EFCS and has cutoff bokeh issues because it doesn't have mechanical shutter above ss 1/1000 with f1.4/f1.2 lenses

you would be better off toning it down and agreeing that e-shutter is a nice feature and workaround and you are working on the code to see if it is technically possible.