DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

M6 II "hidden features" thread

Started Jan 17, 2022 | Discussions thread
ThrillaMozilla Veteran Member • Posts: 7,665
Re: M6 II "hidden features" thread
2

wddxnyr wrote:

Your test was not well controlled, because the shots were taken handheld. The pixel density on this camera is so high that the 1/eqv. FL rule from the past is vastly inadequate. 1/60s is way to slow for about 195mm even with some help from Is.

R2D2 not only can take sharp photos at 1/60 s, 200 mm, but he did.  The photos he posted are quite sharp.  I also posted sharp photos taken under similar conditions.  The IS is a huge help, and he also has steady hands.

A little motion blur can wipe out any difference in sharpness.

In R2D2's pictures, do you see any motion blur that wiped out any difference in sharpness?  I don't.  You might have a point if his pictures were fuzzy, but they're not.

Again, you don't see the issue in your use (or there is workaround) does not mean that the issue does not exist.

You got that right.  Other people, including me, have reported problems.  We don't know why some people such as R2D2 do not experience a problem.  The problem is not what I would call severe, and there are workarounds.

Camera-induced motion artifacts are not unique to this camera.  Even some flagship DSLRs from recent years have shown serious to severe problems.

 ThrillaMozilla's gear list:ThrillaMozilla's gear list
Canon EOS Rebel SL1 Canon EOS M6 II Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow