bought a Sigma 100-400

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
OP z2122 Senior Member • Posts: 2,009
Re: bought a Sigma 100-400

sirhawkeye64 wrote:

z2122 wrote:

.. I understand that the Nikon 100-400 is a very good lens, but for occasional use it is too expensive. So I bought a used Sigma 100-400 for only 600 ,- As far as I have seen the Sigma is sharper @400 than the Nikon 80-400 G.

Do I need the Sigma dock? Are there any problems when the Sigma 100-400 is on a Z6?

I would get a dock regardless. I always did with the Tamrons I had when using the Z's, just in case in the future, if a firmware update (for the lens) came out. You might as well get a dock IMO.

I too was in the same boat (can't really justify the Z 100-400, so I've been looking at alternatives -- haven't made up my mind yet...)

I compared the Tamron and the Sigma 100-400 and found the Sigma is better. 2 years ago I had the Sigma, but sold it to buy the 300pf. At the end I missed the flexibility of the 100-400. IQ wise the Sigma was very close to the 300 pf and compareable to my 70-200 f4.

Do you have other lenses that you consider?

-- hide signature --

catch the light - explore emotions

 z2122's gear list:z2122's gear list
Nikon Z6 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F4G ED VR Nikon Z 24-70mm F4 Nikon Z 85mm F1.8 Nikon Z 24-200mm F4-6.3 VR +10 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow