For about the same price..RF 70-200mm F/4 or EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS iii ?

Started 6 months ago | Questions thread
KEG Veteran Member • Posts: 4,045
Re: I chose the RF 70-200 f4.0L

SteveinLouisville wrote:

I had the EF 70-200 2.8L ii, and traded it for the RF 70-200 f4.0L and never have regretted it. The RF is so much lighter and compact and has at least as good IQ as the 2.8L. The slower aperture has never been an issue. I might be shooting at a higher ISO but with the RP I can get great results all the way to ISO 6400.

You are basically summing up the reasons why I got 70-300L.

-- hide signature --


 KEG's gear list:KEG's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Canon EOS R Canon EOS RP Canon EF-M 32mm F1.4 Canon RF 50mm F1.8 STM +21 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow