DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Not good

Started Nov 16, 2021 | User reviews thread
dmanthree
dmanthree Forum Pro • Posts: 10,302
Re: There are also many other reviews, more serious

KariP wrote:

Lars wrote:

I had it for two weeks and returned it. My Benchmark is Nikons 14-30 S.

Even after applying the new lens profiles in LR, the Canon 14-35 shows heavy distortion and absolutely terrible CAs. Sharpness is ok, not more. AF and Build quality is good.

I wanted to like it, but this is completely overpriced. The Nikon is better all around at 60% of the price.

Another RF lens letdown after the pretty unremarkable/soft 24-105 L and ridiculously poor STM AF on the 85mm f/2.

Majority are quite positive, but of course vignetting and distortion are mentioned always - and the non existent lens profiles in Capture one and others.
i took the risk an bought the lens today - knowing There will be some issues.
I am trying to build a portable system with this lens , 24-105 ( very good review in a trusted site) and very good RF70-200f4L which is jus stellar IMO ( i have the lens)

W ill report

There are lens profiles in DPP (of course) and ACR. Both work really well. Not sure about other packages, though. No question, this lens NEEDS correction, but once corrected it's really nice.

-- hide signature --

---on the cutting edge---

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow