DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Not good

Started Nov 16, 2021 | User reviews thread
Niko Todd
Niko Todd Forum Member • Posts: 83
Re: Not good

Lars wrote:

Niko Todd wrote:

Lars wrote:

I had it for two weeks and returned it. My Benchmark is Nikons 14-30 S.

Even after applying the new lens profiles in LR, the Canon 14-35 shows heavy distortion and absolutely terrible CAs. Sharpness is ok, not more. AF and Build quality is good.

I wanted to like it, but this is completely overpriced. The Nikon is better all around at 60% of the price.

Another RF lens letdown after the pretty unremarkable/soft 24-105 L and ridiculously poor STM AF on the 85mm f/2.

Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 S Lens Image Quality (the-digital-picture.com)

That looks extremely bad, not sharp anywhere at any aperture, almost like a defect. The sample variations that various sites mention probably are correct and mabye I was on the lucky side with the Nikon and unlucky side of the Canon.

Even Thom Hogan said that he was noticing very unpleasant copy variation trend in the Z lineup. Wide lenses are difficult indeed. Never heard  about a legendary wide lens from Canon tbh, but Nikon has one - 14-24

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow