DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

results of a new technique for 2D-to-3D conversion

Started Nov 9, 2021 | Discussions thread
uuglypher
OP uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
Re: results of a new technique for 2D-to-3D conversion

tony brown wrote:

uuglypher wrote:

In case y’hadn’t noticed, these are for parallel gaze!--
uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

Very strangely, I see them better as Xeyed than parallel !

Although elderly and no expert, I make, watch and see many, many 3D images and have no difficulty seeing depth with Anglyphs, Side by Sides and Xeyeds but these leave me unsure and look more 3D to me viewed as Xeyed.

Have you tried viewing them as such? Strange effect, but to me they look flatter Side by Side.

Hi, Tony; yes, I have tried X-view, but the // View works best for me. The images are symmetrically counterposed, and thus intended to work by // view.  Glad to hear that you - as well as I at 81 - are among the 27% of those older than 65  with robust binocular depth perception. I should note that it is not unusual to encounter individuals who paradoxically prefer to X view some image pairs intended for // viewing. No good explanation for it. The ophthalmologists and optometrists I’ve asked about it can only suggest it may have something to do with the poorly understood phenomenon of the “dominant eye”. No big help there!

Here are a few more en face examples to try. Let me know how these work for you!

Best regards,

Dave--
uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow