For about the same price..RF 70-200mm F/4 or EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS iii ?

Started 6 months ago | Questions thread
Sinawang Forum Member • Posts: 75
Re: wasting time

ZX11 wrote:

You are wasting time. Some people here don't care about the lens pumping air and whatnot in and out. So far (two years of use) there hasn't been a lot of people having problems with it.

I bought the EF version somewhat because it was an internal design, known to be durable, and cheaper. The RF version didn't impress me. The RF 85mm f1.2 did impress me so I spent the money on it.

There is someone on the forum with a RF 70-200 f2.8 with fungus inside it on the elements. Not sure where it is.

There you go. How can that dust & mold ended up on the back of the front element where there are multi sealing inside the lens barrel behind the front element as shown below? Super ninja nasty dust!

 Sinawang's gear list:Sinawang's gear list
Canon EOS RP Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM Canon 85mm F1.4L IS USM Canon RF 50mm F1.8 STM Canon RF 70-200 F4 L +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow