DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Caravaggio anticipated 3D conversion?

Started Oct 15, 2021 | Discussions thread
uuglypher
OP uuglypher Regular Member • Posts: 250
Re: Caravaggio anticipated 3D conversion?

Turbguy1 wrote:

Framing is forced on us in any photography. Stereophotography moves framing into a "third dimension".

I seem to recall specifically commenting being disturbed by lack of homologous details at the bottom of your post, not the sides.

As I said, welcome to the (constraints) of the (rectangular) stereo window.

A huge fraction of stereophotographers recognize the stereo window, and demand it is to be "respected".

In general, no element of a well-done stereophoto should be displayed in front of the selected Z axis position of the frame (which is easily adjustable), while simultaneously contacting/intersecting the frame. Lack of homologous image elements at the top or bottom of the frame can be disturbing, and indicate poor alignment effort.

Some stereophotographers even posit that NO element should be displayed in front of the frame, even if it does not contact/intersect the frame. Those special "pop-out" cases should be carefully selected.

-- hide signature --

Wayne,

perhaps you would respond to the specific examples at:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/65295768

Dave
uuglypher
"100% of the shots you don't take don't go in!"
Wayne Gretzky

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow