For about the same price..RF 70-200mm F/4 or EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS iii ?

Started 6 months ago | Questions thread
Shaun_Nyc Senior Member • Posts: 2,330
Re: For Example

Sittatunga wrote:

Shaun_Nyc wrote:

I would take either EF 2.8 III or F4 II over their plastic dust sucker counterparts. Yea I really don't care that both RF offerings collapse smaller for storage lulz I also think the RF lens will not hold up compared to the EF L build quality.

Environmental filters up the wazoo to compensate for this poor design, we already knew this. I think these poly carbonate lens bodies & lens barrels are going to age terribly and look like hell in short order. Users are scratching them w their finger nails by accident .

As far as practical reasons for sports ?

 Shaun_Nyc's gear list:Shaun_Nyc's gear list
Nikon D50 Nikon D810 Canon EOS R6 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED +15 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow