For about the same price..RF 70-200mm F/4 or EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS iii ?

Started 6 months ago | Questions thread
Mr F48 Forum Member • Posts: 73
Re: Obvious differences
1

Paysen wrote:

To me the EF 70-200 2.8 has a big advantage: Internal zoom and internal focus. It is less likely that you get dust or moisture inside of the EF lens imo. The lens is sucking air inside of it when the front element extends because extending the lens increases the internal volume of the lens. This can cause dust and moisture to be pulled into the lens when zooming in and out.

True. But it's also the main reason I have replaced it with the RF 2.8.

The EF 70-200 2.8 III is a fantastic lens that I just never brought with me. I love the compactness of the RF version.

 Mr F48's gear list:Mr F48's gear list
Canon EOS R6 Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM | A Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow