For about the same price..RF 70-200mm F/4 or EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS iii ?

Started 8 months ago | Questions thread
PicPocket Veteran Member • Posts: 5,357
Re: Obvious differences
2

Luis Gabriel Photography wrote:

My main concern is AF accuracy after my experience with the 70-200 is ii. Unlike my Sigma lenses that are pretty much perfect, the Canon is not, when it comes to consistent tack sharp focus.

FWIW, I moved from EF 70-200 f2.8 II to the RF 2.8, and what I observed was:

  • RF is lighter, compact and handles better. f4 should be even better
  • AF accuracy was similar, speed RF is slightly better. The relevant point here is that I didn't see accuracy problems with EF lens on R5 using Canon control ring adapter
  • RF IS is better
  • focus breathing isn't something that bothered me for stills shooting. Can achieve same magnification and in fact prefer shorter MFD. This is something people will have different views on.

Personally, I don't know how the f4 lens compares

-- hide signature --
 PicPocket's gear list:PicPocket's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +13 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow