For about the same price..RF 70-200mm F/4 or EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS iii ?

Started 6 months ago | Questions thread
Luis Gabriel Photography
OP Luis Gabriel Photography Senior Member • Posts: 2,558
Re: Obvious differences
1

tkbslc wrote:

Not really much to say here, you just have to decide what is more important.

One is a stop faster, but is much larger and heavier - plus it adds an adapter

The other is small, light, and no adapter, but is a stop slower.

Do you value max aperture or size and weight more? That's the decision to make. We can't make it for you.

Personally I favor the weight and went with RF f4.

I know the obvious differences. If that is all I needed, I would not make a thread. I already mentioned size and weight are of no importance. I dont expect others to make a choice for me but to share their feedback using the lenses.

My main concern is AF accuracy after my experience with the 70-200 is ii. Unlike my Sigma lenses that are pretty much perfect, the Canon is not, when it comes to consistent tack sharp focus.

 Luis Gabriel Photography's gear list:Luis Gabriel Photography's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R6 Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM | A Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art Sigma 105mm F1.4 DG HSM Art +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow