What Nikon could learn from Canon's "DX" lenses

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Flat view
ZapperVT Senior Member • Posts: 1,440
What Nikon could learn from Canon's "DX" lenses

One of the frustrations with the Z DX series is the lack of lenses. What if Nikon were to introduce these DX lenses:

  • Z DX 11mm f/2 prime, 165g, $299
  • Z DX 16-70mm f/2.8-4.8, 395g, $399
  • Z DX 70-270mm f/4-5.6, 635g, $649

Not bad, eh? For 1195g and $1347 one could have a compact travel kit with reasonable DX apertures that covers FF equivalent 16-400mm on your Z50. I for one would be pretty excited to buy the first two of those lenses.

Well, this is what Canon has released, except those are FF lenses:

  • RF 16mm f/2.8, 165g, $299
  • RF 24-105 f/4-7.1, 395g, $399
  • RF 100-400 f/5.6-8 635g, $649

These lenses have been roundly criticized for their slow aperture, but as shown above, in APS-C terms these are very reasonable apertures.

An argument against DX lenses has often been made here: an FX lens with equivalently slow aperture and build quality would also be small, light, and cheap. The counter-argument was that Nikon doesn't build such lenses.

Well, now Canon does. Instead of introducing a line of RF APS-C bodies and lenses, they are satisfying the smaller/lighter/cheaper customers with slower FF lenses. This allows them to focus their effort on one platform (assuming the M mount is more or less a dead end) instead of segmenting their effort between DX and FX as Nikon is doing.

 ZapperVT's gear list:ZapperVT's gear list
Nikon D500 Nikon Z7 Nikon Z50 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm F1.8G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 20mm f/1.8G ED +9 more
Nikon Z50
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow