More 16 F2.8 comparisons: corrected vs. uncorrected vs. JPG

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
koenkooi Contributing Member • Posts: 502
Re: More 16 F2.8 comparisons: corrected vs. uncorrected vs. JPG
6

KlaasK wrote:

Scrolling through this thread as a real novice, one thing came to mind. I see a lot of replies discussing the loss of pixels. However, I would be more "concerned" with the loss of mm.

To me it appears as if, after correction, this 16 mm lens actually delivers 17 or even 18 mm wide shots.

It's 16mm after correction, but 14-ish mm before correction. Like the 24-240 is 21-ish mm at the wide end.

 koenkooi's gear list:koenkooi's gear list
Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS M Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM +20 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow