DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

If you value small size and weight, this is a great standard zoom for full frame

Started May 8, 2021 | User reviews thread
Bas Hamstra Senior Member • Posts: 2,070
This lens is way underrated

It was my standard FF to-go zoomlens for so many years. In fact I already had it in the film days. Then I thought the digital little Ixus could do everything better. Until I got another crop DSLR and then later the 5D, which came with ANOTHER 28-105. So I have 2 now. This lens has always given me excellent results (sharpness, beautiful bokeh, focussing accuracy and speed) and I totally don't understand why it has such a bad reputation. An old friend who is also a pro landscaper (see the wonderful name www.imaginature.nl) had printed out these gorgeous poster size prints, hanging in his shop and that's why I bought this lens in the first place.

If you go to the Digital Picture you can compare this lens to the 24-105L for sharpness, you will get a few eye openers. The trick is to treat this lens as a 5,6 fixed aperture lens. The 24-105 is an F4 lens, so this is your F5,6 lens. Practically just as sharp and way lighter.

Currently I am using a 28-135 and that one is WAY heavier (and perhaps a tad sharper in the centre). Below a holiday shot with the BRILLIANT 5D+28-105 combo that can be bought for 200 bucks or so nowadays but still makes stunning images, even by todays standards. And 200 bucks means you actually *dare* to take your camera to the beach which I gladly did (including swimming and leaving the camera under a towel).

Bas Hamstra

 Bas Hamstra's gear list:Bas Hamstra's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 6D Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus E-M1 II Canon EF 35mm F1.4L USM +11 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow