A point about the DSLR/.vs./MIRRORLESS

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
lickity split
lickity split Veteran Member • Posts: 6,137
Re: A point about the DSLR/.vs./MIRRORLESS

briantilley wrote:

lickity split wrote:

BasilG wrote:

Droster wrote:

lickity split wrote:

briantilley wrote:

Bruce Ferjulian wrote:

So all the hype about mirrorless was for size and weight but so far all the mirrorless lenses are larger than their previous counterparts.

Not ALL of them.

The Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S is 18% shorter and nearly 25% lighter than the AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E VR. The Z 14-24mm is smaller and lighter, too.

The 24-70 E grew a lot over the G version ,how’s the Z compare in size to the G ?

126mm in length

133mm in length

Still 5% shorter and 11% lighter.

Not to mention - all that at better optical quality.

I cant see it , can you tell the difference ? Thought not.

I can see a clear benefit in resolution from the Z lens compared with the G lens, especially away from the centre. I'm not the only one...


Well if the two or three of you are happy switching systems or adding a Z to your DSLR that’s fine with me but my D850 does everything I need it to do and it’s capable of shooting moving subjects unlike the Z system, as long as your happy that’s all that matters

-- hide signature --

“Perhaps if you removed some clothing . “

 lickity split's gear list:lickity split's gear list
Nikon D850 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D ED-IF Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye +11 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow