Is anybody going to use the 40 mm f2 on the Z50/Zfc?

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
thisisbenji Regular Member • Posts: 319
Re: Nikon > Viltrox

Nevermess wrote:

thisisbenji wrote:

But it’s also bigger and DX only. For me 80% of the draw on this 40/2 is it’s size and weight. I have a few of the bigger primes and they’re great, but they’re hard to casually carry. This 40/2 should make any of the Z cameras small enough to fit in just about any bag. Right now, the only two lenses that do this are the 16-50 and 24-50. Those lenses are okay, but for me, they’re just too dark in most scenarios.

Viltrox is just 100 gr more and I would accept it for the metal, better build. Also Viltrox is faster. If Viltrox is better optically I would never consider this 40 F2 plastic lens.

From what I can tell, the Viltrox lens is more than 50% longer. That’s a huge deal breaker compared to the Nikon 28 and 40

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow