Re: It is the same old same old with everybody
1
Sittatunga wrote:
MikeJ9116 wrote:
Sittatunga wrote:
MikeJ9116 wrote:
Sittatunga wrote:
MikeJ9116 wrote:
Everybody Canon has always milked buyers for as much as they can for their medium to upper tier products. What they are doing now isn't new to them. A lot of people complain about the high prices and then give them their money for overpriced gear. It is a cycle that has gone on for the past 100-150 years.
I'm not completely convinced. The 80/20 rule says you get 80% of the result for 20% of the effort, hence the good value of the medium to lower tier products. It's the final 20% that represents 80% of the cost and effort.
Pentacon tried something better but I would have hated living in the DDR. So did the USSR, but with very little incentive for quality assurance or stock control or improvements. A functioning market might have either changed that or killed the industry.
I think Canon's medium tier is mostly over priced too. Many things run in cycles. Political systems, Sun cycles, seasons etc.
We all have different priorities and different ideas of what things should cost. But it's the stuff pulling up in warehouses that's overpriced, not the stuff that's in short supply.
Overpriced is overpriced. Short supply just makes it more overpriced.
The prices too high for you and your perception of what the products are actually worth.
Perception of worth of a product is always part of the process of what one thinks is proper pricing. Each person has their own perception.
I have that problem with Apple. But that's my problem, not theirs and it didn't stop me recommending an iPhone to my sister.
It can be their problem. If enough people think their price is too high then they won't sell enough of their products. Most companies like to gouge the people who have to be early adopters. People who wait a while usually can get substantial discounts for their patience.
The R5 and R6 are too expensive for me, but that doesn't make them overpriced, it's just that they are more capable than I actually need. Maybe there's a bubble, in which case it will burst sooner or later. But it's the stuff piling up in warehouses and the August Bank Holiday Sale prices still being advertised near mid-September that are the real indicators of overpriced goods.
I can afford any MILC Canon makes but I am also pragmatic with what I purchase. This is not only for cameras but products in general. I don't care how Canon prices the R3 because it is a camera I have zero interest in buying. It could have a price of $1,500 and I still wouldn't buy it. There is a saying.... "Those that use cutting edge technology has a wallet that bleeds a lot." The fact is that very few people need cutting edge technology. Even professionals. I am grateful for these people though because they allow me to get this technology for greatly reduced prices over time on the used market.
IMO, the reason the R6 and R5 prices are remaining high is because Sony hasn't released the A7/4 yet. When they do Canon will likely do a big price drop on many products from the R5 and down. If you remember, Canon dropped the prices of the 5D/4 and especially the 6D/2 right after the A7/3 launched. I expect the A7/4 is going to be quite a camera. It will likely have a 30+ mp fast readout sensor with excellent DR, and excellent AF, burst rates, battery life etc. I also think its menu system will be greatly improved as will its handling. It will be priced like the R6 but be a heavy competitor to the R5. I suggest you hold on to your money until the A7/4 is released.
Like I said, many people complain about price then their consumerism instinct combined with marketing manipulation prods them into paying more than they think they should. Canon has become a master at overpricing, market manipulation and at times limiting supply to drive up prices even further.
Can you give any specific instances?
You are an example with your recommendation of an iPhone to your sister. Although you did not buy the iPhone directly you did this by proxy.
Or are you confusing them with Leica? I can understand Leica limiting supply, it's what exclusivity is all about, but how does limiting supply help Canon's aim to be the biggest seller in the market?
Canon is a savvy marketer. In a fast shrinking market, limiting supply helps keep prices up and, more importantly, profit margins.
I am not singling out Canon here either. Plenty of companies do the same. This is why I hardly ever become an early adopter of anything.