Nikon 24-200 any better than the Olympus 12-100?

Started Dec 4, 2020 | Discussions thread
YordanRhapsody Regular Member • Posts: 373
Re: Pretzel Logic

Dear All

I'm long time user of m43, I have Em1.2 with 12-100 (replaced 12-40) and I love the build, contrast, sharpness

I also have Nikon Z6 with 24-70/4

I was wondering to try 24-200 for Z6, this will make Oly 12-100 and Nikon 24-70 redundant in some way

What I will miss from Oly will be build and mfd for sure

unfortunately there are no "cheap" solutions in Nikon Z system for tele lenses, 70-200 is too big and expensive for my use, adapted 70-300 is also unconfortable and almost at the same price of 24-200

I still don't know if I'll move entirely my system to Z, which has without a doubt a better IQ, especially in low light situations, but I have too much gear right now

If m43 will present a body with at least 2 stops better low light IQ, then I believe olympus lenses offering is wonderful

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
HUN
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
NCB
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow