Why no Sigma 70-200/2.8?

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
rashid7
rashid7 Veteran Member • Posts: 6,295
Re: Why no Sigma 70-200/2.8?

"It's also quite a big jump in weight + price for 1 stop of light, so have you considered the f4 too?"

It always is, no?

An exception is the new mirrorless lenses from Tamron, and Sigma.  Size is what interests me in the new 28-70f2.8C from sigma.  Apparently it ain't a bad lens either (-;

The much bigger 24-70 has been adopted by Leica, which is quite an endorsement!

There are complaints that it is a dust magnet, but (4me) that isn't a big issue.

The 1st copies of the 28-70 had a defect that, w/ time, yielded nasty ghosting/reflections?

-- hide signature --

Keep it fun!

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow