Nikon Z 24-200 f/4-6.3 compared to Canon RF 70-200 f/4

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
OP DaveR43 Senior Member • Posts: 1,597
Re: Nikon Z 24-200 f/4-6.3 compared to Canon RF 70-200 f/4

BasilG wrote:

MrHollywood wrote:

All I say is what my eyes tell me, and that's FAR more meaningful than any graphs.

Yeah, who needs actual data when they can have guesswork.

On my Z7II or Zfc, the 24-200 is extremely sharp at 24mm and 200mm. I have the 24-70 2.8 S and 70-200 2.8 S, so I think I know what "sharp" is all about.

The 24-200 performs at a level that is fairly shocking. I really didn't believe the hype, took a shot and ordered one for casual use. It has exceeded my expectations.

https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-z-70-200mm-f2-8-vr-s/4

Sharpness comparison between the 24-200 and the 70-200. Not even close at 200 mm.

True.  But it would be interesting to see how the Canon RF 70-200 f/4 on an R5 compares to the Canon RF 70-200 f/2.8 on an R5, both tested under the same conditions.

-- hide signature --

DaveR

 DaveR43's gear list:DaveR43's gear list
Canon PowerShot G7 X Nikon D300S Nikon 1 V1 Nikon D600 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm F4G ED VR +15 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
HUN
MOD TOF guy
MOD TOF guy
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
xtm
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow