Nikon Z 24-200 f/4-6.3 compared to Canon RF 70-200 f/4

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
kenw
kenw Veteran Member • Posts: 6,926
Re: Nikon Z 24-200 f/4-6.3 compared to Canon RF 70-200 f/4
1

DaveR43 wrote:

ZapperVT wrote:

starbase218 wrote:

ZapperVT wrote:

True. You would need specialized optical equipment like Roger Cicala at Lensrentals developed to measure the lens MTF without a camera to make a true comparison of just the lenses.

Or use a Z7 II with an adapter (if one is available).

There is no adaptor from R to Z because the mount diameters are nearly the same.

However, the flange focal distance for the Z mount is only 16 mm, whereas for the Canon RF mount it is 20 mm So an RF to Z adaptor could be constructed.

A dumb adapter for MF lenses, yes. But there’s no space for electronics. The Sony E to Z adapters use the fact that the E throat is so narrow compared to Z to get the volume necessary for electronics. That’s not an option for R to Z because the throat diameters are fairly close.

EDIT: As pointed out by another poster even a dumb adapter is not possible due to the required depth for the bayonet combined with the similar mount diameters.

-- hide signature --

Ken W
See profile for equipment list

 kenw's gear list:kenw's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 Nikon Z7 Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH Nikon Z 14-30mm F4 Nikon Z 24-200mm F4-6.3 VR +42 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
HUN
MOD TOF guy
MOD TOF guy
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
xtm
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow