Re: Fuji S5 Pro post-processing comparisons (love Cameras, hate Computers (software))
1
fPrime wrote:
dadu007 wrote:
fPrime wrote:
Congrats on picking up an S5 Pro! As you’ve found, there’s no currently made Fuji camera (GFX included) that can quite match the S5 Pro’s colors.
Every converter has options for developing RAW files, and particularly with HU some of these are less than obvious to brand new users. You might just not be using HU with best practices yet.
If you’d like, post a link to a RAW file from your S5 Pro and the output from RAW Therapee that you like. I’d be happy to run it through my own optimized HU processing so that you can see the rendering differences.
fPrime
Sure! I'd love to see what you can do with the file in HU.
Here's the link to a folder with the .jpg from my Raw Therapee and the original .RAF from my Fuji S5 Pro. I also included a screenshot of the file loaded fresh in HU:
Fuji S Pro RAF and RT jpg
Thanks! You actually chose a good RAW here with skin tones, highlights close to being blown, plenty of detail, and outdoors where the WB is relatively predictable. I went with 5000K for WB and didn't apply any lens corrections outside of CA removal since I wasn't sure which 35mm was used.
Here's my HU VS-3 output for the file you shared:
HU VS-3
And just so we can flip back and forth here is the RT processed file:
RAW Therapee
Before I bias the comparison with my own observations, what differences can you see between these two?
fPrime
Any particular reason to avoid Lightroom and Capture One (other than the cost)? They do a decent job as well.
I'm glad you guys are happy with this old camera but, sorry, I don't see anything magic about the color, rendering, anything really.
Lightroom