RF24-105/4 performance

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
Higgins2002
Higgins2002 Contributing Member • Posts: 714
Re: RF24-105/4 performance
1

Peak freak wrote:

Higgins2002 wrote:

My lemon ...not acceptable

Left side 24mm F8

from the same image as above

That is junk!

But you might be in luck because it is so bad Canon should replace it no question.

The concern is that Canon has apparently allowed this sort of product to reach market. I thought those days were over.

If nothing else you have confirmed my suspicions that there are indeed poor Canon RF lenses in circulation.

First time I got a bad L lens.

I'm thinking more and more about this letter L does it stand for Lenshood included nowadays?

It sure doesn't give you any other benefit over the non L without hood.

Yes I'm getting a new one ....they admitted it was bad.

I'm going to be very picky this time checking everything first day and if it's not to my liking I send it back.

The L lenses should be less of a compromise than the non L versions.

 Higgins2002's gear list:Higgins2002's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon Extender EF 1.4x III Canon EF-S 10-18mm F4.5–5.6 IS STM Canon EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS II Canon RF 35mm F1.8 IS STM Macro +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow