Sony Alpha 1, SEL 200-600 or Canon R5, RF 100-500

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
duncang Regular Member • Posts: 472
Re: Sony Alpha 1, SEL 200-600 or Canon R5, RF 100-500

win10-64 wrote:

Both shots of Swallows are yours not mine. The first one shot using your A1+200-600mm looks sharper around the eye, head, body and more detailed than your 100-400mm shots.

The 100-400mm shots are blurrier around the eye and elsewhere compared to your 200-600mm shot.

Here is a better series for you - if you can hold your 200-600 for long enough to catch this then they should come out pretty much just as sharp - I think you would be hard pressed to tell the difference.

I should have some decent full frame ones with the a9 and 200-600 and 100-500 - but it might take a while to find them.

For this the big advantage of the 100-400 is size and weight - sharpness not so much.

Most of these are at 1/8000 f8 so you can do that easily with the 200-600.

I don't know if it is possible to get much better than this. For sure the a9/R5 fall over at 20fps here since they won't capture all the action.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow