Why Olympus is an ACE in all sizes ! Locked

Gnine wrote:

Raist3d wrote:

victorav wrote:

Yxa wrote:

absoluutbeginner wrote:

About Olympus camera lenses sizes and complaints .

I have the E-M10 ..small compact and i can use all m4/3 lenses (normal and Pro) with kit lens .

I have E-M5 something bigger and i can use all m4/3 lenses ( normal and Pro ) with kit lens .

I have E-M1 series a bit more bigger and i can use all m4/3 lenses (normal and Pro) .

I have E-M1X great camera for wildlife ... much more people are discovering the greatness of this camera after 2years .... (this E-M1X has been burned down from the start by stupid people ) , and i can put all m4/3 lenses on it (big and small) .

I bought the 300mm Pro when it first came out ..... a marvel ! a small big lens which blows away the competition ..still after using it for 4 years ? I bought several small lenses too.. and they are all very good for what i do.

I dream about the 150-400mm .. a huge Pro lens .... which is a send from someone out there in the universe .... but a but to hefty on price for me .

So anyone complaining about the size ? Come on .. you have a choice , from small to bigger ..but all still small in comparison to the rest of the brands .

So you have a choice and next to it brand new technology ..... I do not see this with the rest of the brands .

Stop nagging and use all shapes and sizes of lenses and cameras to put you effort into making your photos ...

You seem happy with your choise, I prefer Panasonic

Panasonic Also has many different sized bodies. Even going one step farther and creating the very small gm series.

The GM series no longer exists There’s no point counting as valid options cameras you can’t buy new anymore as an advantage and offering for that company

Why no m4/3 insecurity jibes Raist3d? Or doesn't that count for Olympus owners?

First of all - the majority of all my calls on m43rds insecurity complex come by a sizable margin, by Olympus owners more than Lumix owners - and I am hardly the first one that notes the most vocal defensive m43rds owners are more in the Olympus camp, more than Lumix.

So you to ask this question tells me that you aren't really following what I write.

But second as for victorv- we are discussing in this sub thread the GMx as a consideration of what's available on the Panasonic side.

But if you mean the OP post - note that while the post kinda goes in that direction it's not really saying that there's no difference or "virtually indistinguishable difference" between m43rds and APSC/FF in an over justify attempt of m43rds as a system vs other system.

Finally- do note I did reply to the OP and questioning why the justification anyway- and pointed out flaws in the argument.

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/65350438

So yeah, not sure what exactly your objection is. I sure seem pretty consistent here.

Please PM me if you have more Q's.