Photo Competition Moral/Ethical Dilemma Locked

Started 2 months ago | Questions thread
This thread is locked.
Quarkcharmed Senior Member • Posts: 1,532
Re: (1) UN-ethical (2) Unfair to whom? . . . but that is just the tip of the iceberg.

Flavil wrote:

BrownieVet wrote:

it says the cameras should be a minimum of 16MP, anything above 16MP is also fine.

That is NOT what your original post had. Read your post again.

It's called a mistake. It's shocking that so many of you couldn't recognize that split seconds after reading it. It's common sense.

It didn't look like a mistake, the OP confirmed the "16 MP rule, no more no less" in the second post:

Not to mention it was cleared up 3 dozen times since.

It was, but only after the OP insisted on the "16 MP exactly" rule and the conversation was evolving over a few pages. Maybe it wasn't deliberate but that's how it looked like.

 Quarkcharmed's gear list:Quarkcharmed's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MOD Smaug01
MOD Smaug01
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow