DAP MV wrote:
André BARELIER wrote:
- Very nice picture, Darius. I missed it at the time you posted it. I like it.
It's a pity nobody seems to be interested in that kind of image. I am: thanks for sharing, and congratulations.
BTW, what does UVIFV stand for? And why "again"?
Thank you for your kind words. I am glad you liked it.
Why "again"? Because some time ago I posted another picture in this technology (Ultra Violet Induced Visible Fluorescence). You have seen it, because you asked for the technical details on how it was taken. Here is a link to that post:
This picture is different, but taken using the same UV technique. On top of it, being in a hurry, I misspelled the acronym: UVIFV instead of UVIVF, as it should be. My bad.
(Coming to think of it, I should have put more complete description, rather than just acronym. Lesson learned.)
For the sake of completeness, here is what the eggs looked like in the daylight:
UV seems to make a difference.
Thanks Darius! I remember that thread, with its impressive photo. But I didn't make the connection with this one.
Yes, UV makes a lot of difference, although the original picture was interesting per se.