Is my thinking about equivalence right?

Started 2 months ago | Questions thread
Jonas Palm Senior Member • Posts: 1,080
Not much further to go then.
1

silentstorm wrote:

Personally I think the sensor size is not important at all. The technology behind the sensor is more important.

Here's a chart from photonstophotos:

My case in point:

From the 1st Oly E1 FT to the current 20MP sensor

From the 1st Canon 1Ds to the current R5

From the Nikon D3 to the current Z7ii

From the Sony Nex7 to the A6600

Everyone can see from the chart that the 20MP mFT sensor is pretty much up there with the best APSc and FF from yester years. With advancing sensor tech and materials, I believe the sensor size in our cameras is no longer relevant.

How many of you here think of equivalency when you bring the camera to your eyes? How many of you here think of equivalency when you bring the handphone camera to a scene?

While you are quite deliberate in avoiding all recent larger sensor cameras, you do well to bring up QE.

The quantum efficiency of todays full frame sensors, (and presumably the quite decent 20MP sensor used the last few years in m43), is above 50% currently just under 60%. 
Which means that even theoretically you cannot improve QE a full f-stop worth.

At best, you might see a third to half an f-stop improvement, and that in itself would be a great achievement. We’re pretty much at the end of the road, it is probably more rewarding to focus ones attention in other areas of sensor/system design where there is greater room for improvement. (Read-out speeds and resolution being particularly low hanging fruit, but there are others.)

 Jonas Palm's gear list:Jonas Palm's gear list
Olympus E-M1
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Yxa
Yxa
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow