RF24-105/4 performance

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
buellom Contributing Member • Posts: 681
Re: RF24-105/4 performance
2

Peak freak wrote:

buellom wrote:

If you want prime lens IQ, use a prime lens. (Or the 28-70/2 maybe.)

That said, your photo looks a little soft in general, softer than I would expect, given that I have the RF24-105 and I think it's very good. I was never happy with my EF24-105. Then I dropped it, the inner tube broke, Canon repaired it and tuned it for me to my camera. From this moment on it was really good.

Thanks but not necessary. Examples from other posters clearly illustrate that this lens is capable of producing excellent results that more than meet my demands.

Keep in mind the tree example has minimum sharpening, but even when sharpened things don't look great.

I have an EF 24-105 Mk1 that, in short, produces better results at 35mm on my EOS R than the RF.

I'm with you, your photo is too soft, not only at the left side. The RF lens should perform slightly better than the EF version (I or II): more consistent from border to border and through the focal range. At least this is my experience.

I've let Canon adjust all my EF lenses to my main EF body which turned good to very good and acceptable to good etc. What ever they do, it's beyond micro AF adjustment. They also adjusted my R with the RF24-105, but I couldn't see any difference. (I'm a CPS member and the Canon repair center is not far from me, so this was easy for me and no shipping was necessary. This service stopped me thinking of switching brands...)

-- hide signature --

********************
www.freude-am-licht.de
********************

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow