Full Frame vs Micro 4:3

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
victorav Senior Member • Posts: 1,823
Re: Full Frame vs Micro 4:3

J A C S wrote:

victorav wrote:

J A C S wrote:

Ainisru wrote:

You can have a nice, super capable weather resistant kit, an E-M5iii + 14-150mm f/4-5.6 with a weigh around 700g. Please find me another system- not as a dare, or provocation made towards you, but highlighting facts that M4/3 still has weight advantages and compactness at its side.

Easy. My phone beats this by a mile in terms of lightness and compactness.

Interesting, so you consider fixed lens cameras as a system camera.

My phone has three lenses and cameras, some have more.

You are limited limited by space, all lenses are fixed, in other words, what you have is what you get.

Ilc's (not just MFT) have much more then three lenses available, now with mirroless, lenses for DSLRs can be adapted, further increasing choice.

Generally phones have the most common focal lengths. So if you happy with those then there is little reason to consider a ILC since you have the lenses you would have bought.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MOD Smaug01
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow