Is my thinking about equivalence right?

Started 3 months ago | Questions thread
bobn2 Forum Pro • Posts: 69,811
Re: Is my thinking about equivalence right?

Muster Mark wrote:

JosephScha wrote:

On page 3 of the 2014 article about Equivalence, it says:

"There are a number of factors in play here, most likely dominated by differences in sensor performance, but with other complications such as differences in transmission between lenses. This is why we tend to state that, although equivalence can be used as a guide to low light performance (and a very good guide in most instances), it can't be used to completely predict the differences."

I think this quote basically supports your (the original post's) point.

You are spot on. I guess I missed this when I skimmed the article and just payed attention to the equations they used.

Better to read it rather than skimming if you want to make any kind of decent critique.

-- hide signature --

Is it always wrong
for one to have the hots for
Comrade Kim Yo Jong?

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow