Full Frame vs Micro 4:3

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
(unknown member) Forum Pro • Posts: 19,317
Re: Full Frame vs Micro 4:3

mfinley wrote:

Michael Piziak wrote:

I actually came away with a conclusion that, just perhaps, all the talk about image quality advantage of a FF camera, perhaps, just perhaps, may be a bit of "hype."

Shooting to post on instagram, facebook, pictures that will sit on your harddrive and never be seen again? Images that will be seen on a computer monitor, it makes no difference.

Shooting for large format printing it makes a difference. Dynamic range, detail, noise etc...

If all your stuff is going to be viewed on a saturated screen the size of a cell phone, it makes no difference.

If M43 finally brings out a new sensor the gap between it and FF will lessen even more for large format images.

no it wont. unless silicon is more efficient. which i doubt very much. thats like saying the sony A1 has a better IQ than the  5 yod a7r2, which it doesnt.


-- hide signature --

Sony A7r2 , A6300
past toys. k100d, k10d,k7,fz5,fz150,500uz,canon G9, Olympus xz1 em5mk1, em5mk2, em1mk2.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MOD Smaug01
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow