Full Frame vs Micro 4:3

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
(unknown member) Regular Member • Posts: 217
Re: Lol, _you_ just just don't get it.

FingerPainter wrote:

MyDog Is Incharge wrote:

I said these are different tools and each has their own strengths.

Indeed, you did. And I don't disagree.

I never said M43 is always going to be better.

Did I say you did?

But you shure think FF is always going to be smaller and better.

I specifically said somethings other than that, so you are the one who just doesn't get it.

And I predicted you got upset when I pointed out one way M43 is smaller or better. I don't think you'll ever be open minded.

The only place I go upset is when you lied about me cherry-picking my examples.

But I did not lie. You picked one of the larger m43 camera to claim m43 was the about the same size as FF.

"Here is a comparison of the size of a current MILC from Canon, Nikon, and Olympus. Most of the size difference has been eliminated.'

But you picked the EM1 instead od the EM10 which has the same sensor! lol! You cherry picked and you know it.  The EM10/4 is newer than the one you picked and much smaller.

You know but intentionally mislead, m43 offers a wide range of sizes and many are tiny vs. the smallest FF camera.


Even with a lens the difference in size is giant. (ignore the lens hood one the FF lens)


So the truth, you cherry picked, you know it.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MOD Smaug01
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow