Full Frame vs Micro 4:3

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
dmanthree
dmanthree Veteran Member • Posts: 9,473
Re: To summarize my experience...
1

D Cox wrote:

dmanthree wrote:

M4/3: smaller and lighter

Are you sure ?

Yes. 100% certain. I'm talking about a system weight including lenses, etc, not just bodies.

https://camerasize.com/compare/#633,858

FF: better IQ

Unless you want greater DoF, for instance for macro shots of insects.

Don Cox

Focus stacking and other methods for greater DoF? But that's a pretty specific case, don't you think? Overall, FF has better IQ. Do you agree or disagree?

-- hide signature --

---on the cutting edge---

 dmanthree's gear list:dmanthree's gear list
Sony Mavica FD-200 Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MOD Smaug01
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow