DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

RF 400, or EF 400 with adapter?

Started Jul 11, 2021 | Discussions thread
PicPocket Veteran Member • Posts: 5,897
Re: RF 400, or EF 400 with adapter?
2

Tambopata wrote:

tkbslc

It's the exact same lens with the same motors, how could it perform AF better?

It's all in the electronics. The RF mount has more connectors than the EF mount (12 vs 8 if I recall correctly), probably more power can be delivered to drive the AF-motors faster, more AF actuations per second to deliver faster and more precicse AF. Canon is quiet about it, but my guess is that all the wireing is changed to allow for complete access to the RF protocol.

Probably. Guess.

If we are guessing, my guess is that it is the exact same lens as EF version with the adapter bolted on. The adapter has 12 pins too. My guess is this is no different

My guess is that Canon didn't see much improvement they could do to the EF lens in the time frame they wanted to release this in. The corresponding EF lenses are fairly new designs. This is also probably why the price didn't jump up like every other RF redesign

We can revisit the guesses when someone is able to do an objective side by side

-- hide signature --
 PicPocket's gear list:PicPocket's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +16 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
cjb
cjb
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow