DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

BIF with R5 and RF 100-500mm compared to A9II and FE 200-600 G

Started Jul 4, 2021 | Discussions thread
Subutai Forum Member • Posts: 54
Re: BIF with R5 and RF 100-500mm compared to A9II and FE 200-600 G
1

I honestly did not notice much of  a difference in autofocus speed between the A9 / 200-600 vs. the R5 / 100-500.  The R5 was better in the sense that it has a much better animal eye focus than the A9 but the A9 is better in that it is truly blackout free.  The R5 has a slideshow effect when you release the shutter and press again, but is blackout free AFTER the initial shutter press.

The main thing I did notice between the two is that the 200-600 is an absolute monster in size/weight when compared directly to the 100-500.  I was shocked at how big the 200-600 is compared to the 100-500.

The 100-500 is definitely something I could hike with and take long scenic walks with without any concern whatsoever.  I'm specifically not buying the 200-600 because it is too large for my uses which is long walks and hikes.

Now compared to bigger super telephoto lenses, the 200-600 is much smaller and portable but compared to the 100-500, the 1-500 is much more portable.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow