DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Slide holding for Scanning - Ohnar and Other Options

Started May 21, 2021 | Questions thread
OP Halina3000 Junior Member • Posts: 32
Re: 80mm f/4 enlarger lens - a compromise

Thanks. Yes I find the thickness of the camera lens body means that it's somewhat problematic to apply my school physics to the question. Instead I decided to try it out.

A few of my test results with the MD lenses, all measurements being from the front end of the lens. I was focusing on a ruler placed where the slide would be and using live view to read the width.

  • 50mm, bellows fully compressed - 72mm to slide, 127 to sensor. 23.5mm wide view
  • 50mm, bellows extended 10mm - 62mm to slide, 137 to sensor. 19.8mm wide view
  • 50mm x 2 converter - 350mm to slide, 154mm to sensor. 48mm wide view.

The lens was set to infinity in each case. I tried it at minimum focus too but that made the field of view slightly smaller.

My conclusion was that if my bellows would squash up further then a 50mm lens might be OK... but they won't. I did repeat the tests after buying a thinner EF adapter ring which cut the lens to sensor distance by 10mm. I cant recall whether the numbers above were before or after this but I do know that it didn't get me to a 36mm wide view with the 50mm lens.

I think that an enlarger lens won't behave significantly differently. The lens body might be shorter and that may move the effective lens position closer to the sensor. Whether that would be enough to create a 36mm wide view... no idea but I decided not to put money on it.

FWIW with the 80mm lens I have 180mm to the slide and 156mm to the sensor which takes in the whole slide image plus a little of the mount.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow