Are bigger pixels less noisy?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
robert1955 Veteran Member • Posts: 6,027
Re: Quantum efficiency, 93° ;)
3

Nick Zochios wrote:

you shared that one before I think. Does not answer my question above: you say unedited but then say 'because of great software.

the second question would be: shouldn't you be using same software on a similar image from a current camera at something like ISO102400?

 robert1955's gear list:robert1955's gear list
Fujifilm X-E3 Fujifilm 16-55mm F2.8R LM WR Fujifilm XF 70-300 F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow