Are bigger pixels less noisy?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
JahnG
OP JahnG Veteran Member • Posts: 3,325
Re: Are bigger pixels less noisy?

spider-mario wrote:

JahnG wrote:

But how about the combined read noise of 50M pixels compared to the combined read noise of 20M pixels. One might thus think that the sensor having only 40% pixel count would have much less combined read noise? (Or shouldn't we sum read noise?).

One would typically sum it in quadrature (sqrt(RN₁² + RN₂² + …)). So if you combine k pixels, each with read noise RN, into one combined pixel, you would consider it to have read noise sqrt(k · RN²) = sqrt(k) · RN.

So, if you apply this to an α7R IV at base ISO to reduce it from 61 MP to 24 MP, you arrive at sqrt(61/24) · 2.9 ≈ 4.6 e⁻ of read noise for the 24 million “new” pixels, which compares favorably to the 6.4 e⁻ of an α7 III and its native 24 MP.

At high ISO, the situation reverses somewhat: at, say, ISO 3200, you would be looking at sqrt(61 / 24) · 1.1 ≈ 1.8 e⁻ for an α7R IV reduced to 24 MP, or ~1.2 e⁻ for an α7 III.

Interesting, thank you

 JahnG's gear list:JahnG's gear list
Canon PowerShot A650 IS Panasonic ZS100 Pentax K100D Super Pentax K-r Pentax K-S1
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow