DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

K1 II and Best cameras for landscape photography in 2021 article

Started May 28, 2021 | Discussions thread
epfler Regular Member • Posts: 313
Re: K1 II and Best cameras for landscape photography in 2021 article
1

JeremieB wrote:

Why wouldn't it be useful for landscape at base ISO, if nothing moves (or even, if some parts move, as there's a mode for this) ?

With PSR you have more DR and better details at any ISO level. Both seem fine for landscape as far as I know.

The other day I had the comparison directly at hand, and PS would win by far, taken against a shot without. Talking about this one:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/187518201@N02/51175488314/in/album-72157715868735698/

Found the version with PS better already with viewing per 100% in comparison (before upload), there is something in the acuity (not talking about resolution then), which the version without PS would not deliver in this case. Made the difference here for the result being somehow useful vs. not because of missing fine details.

(Btw. RawTherapee, which is used here, has fine support for PS, but normally I try to avoid such amassing of data, which PS brings along.)

The oxen in the rain didn't move during the 4 shots. Talking about stills here.

On different occasion I had by chance taken an image of a train passing by, having forgotten to switch PS off, which was perfect then, as only one of the takes was useful, the other ones where blown-up in wrong timing. With RawTherapee one may ignore the other takes when only one is to survive.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow