dgumshu
•
Veteran Member
•
Posts: 4,623
Re: Original 600mm F4 (non-IS)
BirdShooter7 wrote:
1Dx4me wrote:
lonewolf1983 wrote:
Norm Neely wrote:
lonewolf1983 wrote:
A well priced original 600mm non-IS has popped up and wondered how this lens stacks up vs its more modern bretheren.
Maybe a good price on a mark ii might pop up?
This is a good comparison of the 600mm mark ii vs 800mm. I think it's a very good read even if the mark ii isn't in your budget.
http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2013/01/15/canon-ef-600mm-f4l-is-ii-vs-canon-ef-800mm-f5-6l-is-and-the-winner-is-2/
Doubtful, few 500mm F4 mkII's available 2nd hand for about $8k
600's attract more dollars
Comparison is the original non-IS i'm picking up for $2.8k
i tend to agree, i have a canon 600mm f4.0 II, hardly used and it is in pristine condition with original carrying box and paper. i paid $13K and wouldn't let it go lower than $11K. i have a LowePro carrying bag and RRS L tripod stand for it. i am not trying to sell it in this thread but rather saying what i would ask for it when time to unload it. i don't regret getting it though. i am 72 now and it is getting difficult for me to hoist it anymore so i don't want it to collect dust on the shelf.
A good friend of mine just picked up a 600mm f/4 mk3 for $10k in like new condition. I’m seeing mk2’s fairly regularly for between $6-7k.
I've seen that too, However, from what I've read, V3 isn't as sharp as V2 with extenders.
Brian, from the Digital Picture tested threes of these v3's. Consequently, I have no desire to upgrade (or downgrade :-)) to V3. I'll wait for the 2nd wave of RF600 F4 reviews before upgrading. The current RF 600 F4 is merely a 600 V3 with an attached adapter.
All that aside, the one I'm really looking forward to is the RF 500 F4.